The SAS Institute concluded from an analysis of online search trends that one of the latest technological fads, the demand for excessive automation, is developing.
Internet research data has already proven to be a useful metric in many subjects for showing changes in mood and maturity in different countries. The The analysis was published on the SAS Institute blog I have now examined excessive automation in this respect, which, like all other new technologies, shows varying degrees of awareness, understanding or need not only in different sectors but also in different regions.
The publication notes that early adopters of excessive automation come from the most competitive and consumer-focused sectors, such as retail, banking, shipping or insurance. They are at the forefront of their digital transformation in many ways, using artificial intelligence and other advanced technologies for years. However, according to SAS, the situation is similar in every country.
Swedes are there a lot
The brief analysis compared online research data from a total of 24 countries to determine which countries are at the fore in awareness of excessive automation and where demand is growing fastest. Although the concept itself has only been around for a few years, it has become apparent that related keywords are becoming increasingly popular in many countries around the world, with 4.5 out of every 10,000 people in Finland actually searching for the term.
The Finns follow the Swedes, the Swiss, and the Irish, but Australia also has a rate of over 10,000 per 2. The Germans or the British tend to be in the middle, while the United States, France, Italy, Spain or Japan are in the lower house. Most interesting, however, is how much interest in the hypermechanism has developed.
The Swedes are second in this regard, too, but the Turks are already ahead here, ahead of the Spaniards, Italians or Poles with an annual increase of 63 percent. Accordingly, the strongest growth in demand is expected in these markets, while the entry laments the British, who performed poorly in terms of net research, not only in terms of interest but also in terms of growth in interest.